The 0.3s direct-to-site claim sounds impressive but raises questions about accuracy. Voice recognition still struggles with ambiguous queries or uncommon website names. How does it handle cases where your intent doesn't match what actually exists? The 'tyranny of URL bars' is pretty dramatic language for what's essentially a voice-enabled browser with better context memory. Most of the core problems - irrelevant results, memory issues - aren't solved by voice input alone. Definitely curious to try the contextual history feature though. Being able to reference 'Tuesday's chart' without remembering exact URLs could be useful for research workflows.